Sargent Resigns!

Granville Township Trustee Wes Sargent resigned tonight. At the end of the regular Trustee's meeting, Sargent handed a letter of resignation to his fellow trustees. After discussion, the trustees voted unanimously with "regrets and praise for all the good work he's done" to accept Sargent's resignation effective December 31, 2008. Sargent has been a township trustee for the past seven years. The resignation leaves one year of his term to be filled by an appointment.

In his resignation letter, Sargent wrote, "It has always been my intent to serve a full term, but the current political environment created by a few local residents has made the time commitment unreasonable which saps my energy and enthusiasm."

Click here to view the entire letter.

During his explanation to fellow trustees and the other people at the meeting, Sargent said, "I'm burnt out."

Sargent went on to say that he wasn't ready to completely retire but he needed something different.

Trustee Habig asked, "Are you still interested in projects in the future?"

"Absolutely!" Sargent replied. He said he would be interested in working on the cemetery project. The township is trying to update its records on the graves within Maple Grove Cemetery.

Sargent said he has enjoyed his time as a trustee and "I just hope I leave this place a little better than when I got here."

The trustees discussed the protocol for replacing Sargent. It was decided that they could immediately begin advertising and accepting resumes of applicants.

The trustees hope to make an appointment in early January.

With an appointment to replace Sargent, the trustees will be left with only one elected member, Fred Abraham. Bill Habig was appointed to replace Jim Havens after he resigned.

***

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Congratulations to Bill Mason, the new Trustee

Yes, that's the word.

The Private Club -- dba as the Granville Township Trustees -- have already selected the new Trustee. You may think that's odd since the Trustees haven't taken applications yet, much less interviewed candidates or consulted the public.

But that's the way our Trustees do business. They hand the baton from one good ol' boy to the next. In 200 years of Granville Township history, never has a Trustee been a woman, a minority or even a Granville Village resident (part of the township). The exclusive club of hand-picked white males shall be preserved for another round.

Some background: The Trustees hate voter intrusions, so they manipulate the system in sleazy fashion, timing resignations to avoid votes on new Trustees. Instead, they hand the paid "elective office" -- and the advantage of incumbency -- to a succession of developer-friendly apparatchiks.

This time it's Wes Sargent's turn to hand his office to Bill Mason. Bill is in his 70s and has lived in Granville for 55 years. He's a former educator, a pretty good athlete, has been active in local civic groups and is known as a pretty good guy. He has no experience in urban planning issues -- the most important thing Trustees do -- and proudly declares himself a loyal supporter of developer Bill Kraner.

In other words, the Club expects him to be a compliant, developer-friendly good ol' boy. (It's never been wrong before.)

For those who don't know, our part-time Trustees (paid, with salary, health insurance and pension benefits) run Township government in a bizarre, amateurish fashion. They divide responsibilities three ways: one Trustee handles all development issues, another handles roads and the third handles public relations. The only one that really matters is the first, and developers control that position with a tight fist.

Trustee Jim Havens, a Columbus real estate development lawyer, ran it until he resigned last year. He handed the job to Trustee Bill Habig, a Columbus real estate development consultant who moved to Granville 18 months before he was given the job -- the least qualified of five applicants.

Trustee Fred Abraham oversees physical plant -- roads, snow plowing, etc. He's in charge of building a new $750,000 township garage, necessitated because of an illegal conflict of interest Fred had because he previously leased garage space to the township. He took over from Lyle King, a classic old timer who'd spent decades as a Trustee.

Wes Sargent, son of a beloved grocer and rec commission stalwart, is the pr guy. He smiles, waves and does what he's told. He's the public smiley face that stands in front of the unpopular Havens and Habig.

The scuttlebutt was that Wes was going to resign last year so he could move to his house in Florida and hand his job to Habig. But Havens got himself into hot water. He took a job working as Kraner's lawyer at the same time he negotiated for the township to buy land from the developer for $10 million. Voters rejected the overpriced deal. Havens bailed and pretty much vanished from Granville.

Habig still got the job. That was pre-ordained. But it was Havens' seat, not Sargent's. Unlike Havens, Habig had no roots here or political acumen and his tenure has been an unmitigated disaster. But he's diligently worked for developers in ten-thumb fashion. And Wes has kept his role for an extra year, smiling, waving, defending every embarrassing Habig move. Painful to watch.

Habig's first job was to join the Kraner development team negotiating against the Granville school district. Wes "asked" him to do so. (See how it works.) Kraner, Kraner's lawyer and Habig formed one team and negotiated on the opposite side of the table from the Granville school board and its lawyer. Habig's work helped undermine the school district's effort to place development restrictions on Kraner's property, which would protect the schools and taxpayers. (Development restrictions, weakened, were later agreed to.)

Mason's job would be similar to Wes Sargent's -- smile, wave, don't think and tell the public all is grand. Developers would make the decisions. Habig would relay their wishes. Mason would present them to the public. Mason's special qualification is that he's a Kraner loyalist, having written the developer an affectionate letter offering his support against those who opposed the overpriced land deal. (What's Kraner's land worth now?)

So you see why Bill Mason is the perfect choice. A popular guy who likes developers. He'll do what he's told and then sell the tale to the public.

I hope the pre-announcement of Bill's appointment doesn't stop others from applying. We need other local actors to apply so the Trustees can put on their hilarious ensemble comedy in which they earnestly pretend to consider all candidates. The show works best when the other candidates are far more qualified than the fellow who's going to get the job. The appointment of Habig, the unqualified outsider, resulted in a bravura performance, although it could have been tightened.

The public won't get to ask questions of candidates. This isn't improv! It's scripted theatre. The Granville Sentinel is the program.

So congratulations to Bill Mason for passing the audition.

I suggest that all candidates rehearse for the show. C'mon, everyone, give it a try!

Raise your right hand. Wave it. Smile. Good!

Remember, no thinking, no talking, no reading.

Now for stage commands.

Developer says: "Sit." What do you do? That's right!

Developer says: "Stand." Perfect!

Developer says: "Zoning?" That's right. shake your head, no.

Most important. Developer says: "Sewer." That's good. But nod more vigorously. Fantastic!

Remember, keep smiling and waving.

That's great! You're ready to be a new Granville Township Trustee.

That is my guess also

I have had the same feeling that the new trustee has already been determined. If you look at the minutes when they selected Habig, they said Bill Mason was the runner-up. Further, if you look at the minutes for September, you will see that Bill Mason attended the 2 meetings prior to Wes announcing his resignation. Conspiracy theory? Possibly. Reality? Likely.

Smile and wave boys. Smile and wave.

Hail to the sammy

Thanks for bringing your perspective to my attention. I'll be headed back across the pond following the OSU-Michigan game to move more work to pro-business climates in the next month. Perhaps you could take up the reasonable development mantle in my absence. Feel better?

Relieved

I will be able to sleep much better tonight now that you have recognized the error. Must decline to take up the "reasonable" development mantle. No one can get the natives (is that politically correct?) stirred up like Buknut. I have said all along that Havens work will be appreciated years from now when people look back and see what was done by his actions. Habig can be great as well given the contacts that he has. I just don't want to see the township turned into urban sprawl. Plenty of commercial areas to develop without loosing out on why people like the area.

Huh?

Isn't there some public discourse about who gets the Trustee job? Are there guidelines that have to be followed?
Wouldn't the person who came in second in the last election be the best way to go? I don't know who it was and I didn't vote for him(her?)but it seems a fair way to go.

Next stop for YesMan and Sammy

Either the Wine Cache or IGA should be able to assist you in your time of need (unless opening a wine shop is overtly pro-developer). Maybe we should start shopping at The Anderson's now and run those nasty pro-development wine shops outta Granville.

Much to your chagrin, I am not whining

Just stating an obvious fact. Please refrain from including me in your anti-development establishment. If you would go back and read my posts, you would see that I am far from anti-development. As long as development is done within the rules and regulations that are laid out then there is no problem. I actually supported buying the Kraner property. I actually support development across from Creno's as long as appropriate studies done by the county. I actually support developing the business park and Owens (just not sold on any residential for this area). So please, Buknut, get some of your facts straight before you keep up the same, tiring posts. You are starting to lose credibility that I use to see in your posts.

Trsutees would benefit from diversity

Rockon's list of attributes needed in the next Trustee is extremely insightful.

The most important qualification is diversity of opinion. Government functions best when there is open discussion from multiple points of view. A three-person board can have a hard time capturing the views and ideas of the community as a whole. That is especially true when you have a system that's being manipulated to preserve a narrow power structure. The custom of having trustees resign before their term is over, so the position can be handed to another like-minded member of the club (to use Yesman's term)is extremely unhealthy for Granville and for competent government.

As my man John McCain said, country first. The trustees should say Granville First and appoint someone who represents a different point of view. The tenor of the times is for bipartisanship. For their own good and for the good of Granville, the trustees need to make it a priority to find someone who has a perspective not currently reflected.

Selection criteria for picking the next trustee

Suggestions for selection criteria:

Understanding of township resident preferences on development

Interest in actually communicating with constituents

Open-minded approach

Diversity of opinion - in other words someone who the two remaining trustees would be unlikely to select, but could, if they would just think about getting someone from a different mold on the board

Sharp intellect

Ability to not be offended by a suggestion that someone other than the trustees has a valuable perspective

An understanding of new development concepts (rather than an orientation to the tired old, proven unsuccessful, sprawl approach)

Understanding of Granville in general (no more imports who haven't a clue)

Long-term commitment to Granville

Resigning with a letter dripping of bitterness

Such a letter suggests it was well past the time for resignation.

This apparent bitterness may well explain some of the inability to effectively communicate: he just didn't want to.

It could be worse

.

Cronyism II -- Wes Sargent's hand-off

Wes complains in his resignation letter that fulfilling public records requests was too time consuming for him. A less time-consuming alternative would have been telling the public what he was doing. If Wes was proud of trying to bring Southwest Licking sewers into Granville at the behest of developers, he should have said so. Instead, he and Habig tried to do it through secret dealings and got caught because Ohio has a public records law. If the Trustees were straight-shooters, what they do in secret would be little different that what they say in public.

Wes' final act of contempt for the public was to time his resignation so close to an election that voters don't get to pick his replacement. His fellow trustee/cronies get the job. Wes spent his seven-year career taking orders, first from Jim Havens, then from Bill Habig. Wes never understood that Granville is bigger than his clique and that government is a public trust, not a private club.

I think Wes meant well. But his world view was too narrow to let him do well. The timing of his resignation reveals his fatal flaw. To Wes, the Trustee job belongs to a small group of guys, not the public.

Wes' departure is very disappointing

We can't know ALL the reasons for his departure and so let's hold off on judging his departure. I have always found Wes to be open to dialogue. We've disagreed about many of the recent actions of the trustees, but I never thought his actions were the result of ill intent.

Wes' comment "With no clerical staff, such has left Trustees spending inordinate amounts oftime fulfilling requests for information instead ofworking on positive projects within our community" is troubling. Couldn't someone be hired to fulfill these requests?

Now what are we going to do? Will another apparently "secretive pro development at any cost" trustee be appointed? Does the public have any say in who is appointed?

An idea...

How about Chris Hawkins replacing Wes?

Wonderful idea!

I can't think of more deserving or trusted hands in which to place the future of Granville! Chris Hawkins for trustee!

I couldn't agree more

Finally, an idea that makes sense. There is nothing more fun to watch than a liberal do-gooder with no professional experience in public affairs, zoning or development being held publicly accountable for their looney ideas. Better yet, watching one squirm while defending their indefensible actions makes for good media and improves attendance at public meetings. Sort of reminds me of watching a slug covered with salt. Hawkins for Trustee!

Really?

So, Wes et al shouldn't be held accountable for their secret actions according to you...but Chris would be because he's the what ever name(s) are you call him for questioning your "peeps",Wes,Bill and Fred. You sound like a good candidate for VP w/ McCain.
What do we need to do to get Chris the job?

Petition for Chris Hawkins

How about a first step of the many, many supporters of Chris Hawkins circulating petitions supportive of his appointment? I'm sure those trustees appointing the Wes replacement would be responsive to such a groundswell movement. Who agrees and how do we start this? CT, any ideas? Petitions in coffee shops?

Hawkins for trustee

Civics 101 for do-gooders: Valid petitions must be circulated by a named petitoner who must personally witness every single signature. It is that whole "transparency rules, nothing behind closed doors" idea that do-gooders love except when it hinders their agenda (think ACORN).

So hummingbird et al, let's get Christopher appointed in a legitimate fashion by following the rules and actually doing the work instead of hoping someone else will do do it for you. PERSONALLY circulate and witness every signature - coffee shops, auto repair shops and bail bondsman beware of unattended (and non-compliant) petitions. (While you are at it, you might want to verify that signators actually live in Granville township and are qualified electors.) Don't embarass us by seeking the suspect signatures of transient Denison students. Let's do it right once and for all.

Thanks

Buknut- Thanks for your "I'm Okay, but the rest of you are idiots" message. Actually, we're not only trainable, we're educable. However, how about appointing you as petition director to assure it's done properly? Hawkins 08!

Yes!

Where do I sign up buknut? I'd be glad to sign a petition for Chris. Has anyone else come forward to fill the position? The more the merrier!
This would be a great community service before you're off to Europe to make your gazillions.

Better Idea

Here's a novel idea. How about everyone wait until they see who applies for the position before starting a petition drive. It is apparently obvious that Mr. Hawkins plans on applying since he did not turn down the suggestion that he be selected. Making up one's mind now without knowing who all of the qualified candidates are is a rush to judgment.

Let's see, experience is important for a trustee?

How much experience in public affiars, zoning or development did Fred Abraham or Wes Sargent, for that matter, have before they became trustees?

Only Bill Habig has that kind of experience and look what that's got us: Westerville/Gahanna type urban sprawl coming to Granville in secret - we mustn't let the public know what's happening or participate in how the public's money is spent.

After all, the Granville farmers and hicks don't understand - only Bill knows what's best for Granville.

Hawkins for trustee

Make it happen, buknut. He's qualified. He's been active in the community in many ways, at the township and school district level. He probably leads the list of most meetings attended by an ordinary citizens. He's open-minded and generous in spirit. And he represents a different perspective that could let issues be worked out cooperatively at the elected official level. It would end the jnhealthy practice of the Trustees secretly doing unpopular things to feed the wallets of developers. (Won't be seeing much of them for awhile anyway.) It would force all parties to be realistic and strive for compromise. That would be best for Granville. Oops. That's my mistake. The trustees don't work for Granville. They worl for developers.. You watch who gets appointed.

Hey bucknut

Since you are all powerful and all knowing, get me appointed and then you can have fun at my expense. I dare you.

It is buknut

.

the timing of Wes' resignation

Let's not pretend. The new trustee has already been chosen from the Private Club that runs the township to benefit developers and landowners. That's why Wes resigned so close to an election: so the Club could appoint his successor, rather than have the voters choose. This replicates the same way that Havens resigned a few seconds after the law required the position be put to the voters -- so Habig (the worst trustee ever?) could be appointed.

This is the same dishonest politics that has operated in the township for years. It is so deeply embedded in the Trustee mentality that even an honest person like Wes doesn't comprehend how an honest government operates. The Trustees are afraid of the voters. So they create a daisy-chain of Club members handing an elected position to the next crony. A sad way for a good person to end his tenure -- his final governmental act is an act of game-playing to screw the voters out of a chance to pick his successor. Very sad, both for Wes and the township.

Bingo

Right on target.

Wes was and is a good trustee

We really haven't had much to choose from for trustee. Fred handily defeated the pending disaster Consolo last go around. It will remain tough to recruit any good candidates for trustee.

What are you doing,Wes?

Why are you leaving the post? Maybe Bill Habig has a brother!